Skip to content

Tim Challies on “If Dead Men Don’t Rise”

April 17, 2013

Courtesy of the Anglican Church League of Australia, I came across a post by Tim Challies titled “If Dead Men Don’t Rise” that complements that excerpt from John Chrysostom on the Resurrection quite well. In that post,  Tim Challies takes a look at 1 Corinthians 15:12-19 and the implications of believing the Resurrection didn’t actually happen.  This is one of the implications that Tim talks about:

“If there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised.” If there is no resurrection, then Jesus Christ has not risen from the dead. We worship a dead man. Jesus went to the cross, he died, he was buried, and his body decayed to dust just like everyone else’s. Christians are followers of a dead man.

The Christian faith is unique in claiming that its great teacher is not only a man but also God; it is unique in claiming that its great teacher not only died but was resurrected. But if there is no resurrection, suddenly the Christian faith is unique only in a few small points, but really, it is pretty much the same as every other faith. We are people who put our hope in a guru, a spiritual leader, who lived and then died. While he lived he taught us some good lessons and helped us see how to live a good and moral life. But then his time was over and he died and is gone. And now we are left trying to be like him, trying to model ourselves after him so we can be good like he was good.

As Tim goes on to point out, the Apostle Paul is ruthlessly honest about this: if the Resurrection did not happen, the Christian faith is in vain.  That is certainly one reason the fact of the Resurrection is questioned so often by those who do not want to believe.  If Dead Men Don’t Rise is another excellent piece by Tim Challies and I hope you will read it all.

About these ads
2 Comments leave one →
  1. Andrew Nixon permalink
    April 21, 2013 10:21 am

    Interestingly in this regard, many well meaning Christians confidently state that where “Science” and the Bible disagree then “Science” must be accepted as authoritative eg.

    1. The Age of the Earth and Universe being billions not thousands of years

    2. Evolution of Humankind and all other life by common descent from a primordial single cell over aeons of time by mutation plus natural selection and not from a fiat creation by a common Designer.

    Well this same “Science” confidently states that dead men DO NOT rise again and all experimental evidence shows this to be true.

    On this issue, should we then accept “Science” or the Biblical Testimony? Why? Are we consistent or selective? If selective, who are we kidding? Think!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 179 other followers

%d bloggers like this: