Skip to content

Bishop Peter Robinson: “Some thoughts about Morning Prayer”

June 1, 2010

Well, Bishop Peter Robinson of the UECNA has written another good post on his The Old High Churchman blog, titled Some thoughts about Morning Prayer.  As you can tell from reading this blog, I myself place a great emphasis on the importance of sound preaching (preferably expository preaching) in our churches, and to be candid I fear for churches where clergy are expected to hold the length of their sermon to under ten minutes (occasionally I have even heard parishioners advocate for five-minute sermons.)  That being the case, I do understand the predicament clergy might find themselves in if they try to preach sermons twenty minutes or longer during a Holy Communion service which will wind up being well over an hour in length if that is done.

Perhaps Bishop Robinson points the way out of this impasse when he writes:

…I have come to the conclusion that parishes need to provide both Eucharistic and non-Eucharistic worship in order to prosper. Please note, I am not suggesting that we neglect the Eucharist, but rather suggesting that we do not put all our eggs in one basket and reach out to those who are not yet ready for Communion.

The first concern that I have about the “Slow Mass/Parish Communion” as the only service is that it creates something of a closed congregation. Part of the reason for this is that, except for a few very Anglo-catholic parishes, Anglicans have an engrained aversion to non-communicating attendance at Holy Communion. Semi-churched Anglicans are at a distinct disadvantage in parishes where the Holy Communion is the main or only service simply because they feel they ought not to be there. In short, they are accidentally excluded and this creates a much sharper distinction between the churched and the unchurched, which is a mixed blessing in a missionary situation.

Secondly, Morning Prayer is a very Evangelical service. For a start, it has a very heavy Scriptural componant. Even with the rather limp-wristed lectionary of 1943, it includes one medium length or two short psalms, and two fairly substantial lessons, one from each Testament. In addition to this there is quite a bit of Scripture in the liturgy itself. It also gives room for a more substantial, expository sermon than can usually be preached at Holy Communion. I generally find that twelve minutes is about your whack at “Slow Mass” if you want to retain any hope of finishing within an hour and a quarter or an hour and an half, but it is perfectly possible to go 20-25 minutes without going much over the hour at Morning Prayer.

This might well be the way for a parish to provide adequate nourishment for the soul in expository preaching as well as the Eucharist, and perhaps more churches should consider this.  If I have a major question about this it would primarily be: when would a parish schedule their Bible Study class for adults in this framework?  Or if a parish was large enough, could a possible schedule be: Morning Prayer – 8:30 am, Bible Study 9:30 am, and Holy Communion 10:30 am?  I’m just pondering this, and I would strongly urge all to read Bishop Robinson’s post.

2 Comments leave one →
  1. June 3, 2010 3:25 pm

    Will, you wrote:

    “As you can tell from reading this blog, I myself place a great emphasis on the importance of sound preaching (preferably expository preaching) in our churches, and to be candid I fear for churches where clergy are expected to hold the length of their sermon to under ten minutes (occasionally I have even heard parishioners advocate for five-minute sermons.)”

    Yes, I can tell! And I have to agree. The lack of expository preaching in the Anglo-Catholic churches is at the top of the list (IMHO) of challenges confronting the Continuum. Unfortunately, the clergy (in general) places too little importance on studying the Word and rightly preaching and teaching it to the Lord’s people.

    Paul writes in Romans 10:
    13 for, Whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved.
    14 How then shall they call on him in whom they have not believed? and how shall they believe in him whom they have not heard? and how shall they hear without a preacher?
    15 and how shall they preach, except they be sent? even as it is written, How beautiful are the feet of them that bring glad tidings of good things!
    16 But they did not all hearken to the glad tidings. For Isaiah saith, Lord, who hath believed our report?
    17 So belief cometh of hearing, and hearing by the word of Christ.

    One way I would put this: salvation is the ongoing work of the eternal God in the church. It is not a one time affair, as most Anglicans would agree. Through the preaching of God’s Word one initially hears the good news and upon the gift of belief in Christ is accounted righteous through his faith, i.e. he the sinner is now justified before God and belongs to Christ. And through the preaching of the Word the believer, now in the church, becomes enlightened and edified as to this great salvation unto which he has been called, and to that end the Holy Spirit works in him unto sanctification, a life-long process. Sanctification… growing trust and faith in Christ as his Saviour and Lord… and the continuing changing of his inward nature as evidenced by godly works (loving God and loving his neighbor); this outworking of sanctification reflects the righteous standing that he has been given in Christ by faith. Preaching is central to this. This is why Cranmer and Jewel gave the two books of Homilies for the clergy to read and preach. There was a need for right preaching of the Word.

    Now I can hear some say, well that’s only part of it. There is the worship in the church: hearing the Law, the reading of Scripture, confession, absolution, receiving the Lord’s Supper and its benefits of grace, etc. Yes, these we do quite well. But we give short shrift to expository sermons. It is only the preaching of the Word that uniquely focuses on our understanding (and lack thereof) by which the Spirit works to enlarge Christ in our minds and hearts, who is the object of our faith and the only source of our salvation.

    Paul again in Romans 12:
    2 And be not fashioned according to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, and ye may prove what is the good and acceptable and perfect will of God.

    The renewing of our minds (replacing, if you would, fallen wrong beliefs with godly true beliefs) is inextricably intertwined with our transformation. And the renewing of our minds is a function of the necessary right teaching and preaching of doctrine according God’s Word, the Articles, the Homilies, and our prayer book. This is central to our English reformed heritage as Anglicans. And, if truly taken up by the clergy as a central calling and duty, faith would be strengthened in church members and those visiting and “shopping” for a church home would find our church service more accessible in that the most likely “shoppers” are coming from Protestant church traditions that emphasize preaching.

    Finally from the 1928 BCP (Ordination):

    “…Mercifully behold these thy servants now called to the like Office and Administration: so replenish them with the truth of thy Doctrine…
    “But we will give ourselves continually to prayer, and to the ministry of the word…
    “… but with doctrine and exhortation taken out of the Holy Scriptures, and with a life agreeable to the same; consider how studious ye ought to be in reading and learning the Scriptures…
    “… And are you determined, out of the said Scriptures to instruct the people committed to your charge…
    “… Will you then give your faithful diligence always so to minister the Doctrine and Sacraments, and the Discipline of Christ…” (by the way, these are the three marks of a true church)
    “… Will you be ready, with all faithful diligence, to banish and drive away from the Church all erroneous and strange doctrines contrary to God’s Word; and to use both public and private monitions and exhortations…”

    I was just passing through so I thought I add a comment. Looks like I added somewhat more than that! ;-)

    • June 4, 2010 1:42 am

      Jack,

      Thanks for that excellent comment. I am completely in accord with what you write, and honestly am baffled as to how it is that so many Anglicans are content with (in my opinion) really only one-half of a complete worship service. The preaching and teaching of the Gospel (and the hearing of it as well) are every bit as necessary for the Christian life as the Eucharist, because they are needed, as you note, for the renewing of our minds (Romans 12, as you quote in your comment).

      Might I suggest you turn that comment into a future post? It would be a great foundation for one, to say the least.

Leave a comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.